Highlights on the 5 reasons:
- She lost the delegate derby. Pure and simple, this is a war to win delegates, one that might not be decided until this summer’s Democratic convention. And when the smoke cleared this morning, it appeared that Barack Obama had ended up with slightly more delegates in the 22 states. Obama’s campaign says the senator finished ahead by 14 delegates. With results still coming in, Clinton’s campaign says the candidates finished within five or six delegates of each other. Either way, Super Tuesday was essentially a draw. Clinton may still hold the edge overall, but Obama is closing in rapidly.
- She essentially tied Obama in the popular vote. (My note: At last count, Clinton appeared to have a VERY slight lead, here.) Each won just over 7.3 million votes, a level of parity that was unthinkable as recently as a few weeks ago. At the time, national polls showed Clinton with a commanding lead — in some cases, by 10 points or more. That dominance is now gone. One reason is that polls and primary results reveal that the more voters get to know Obama, the more they seem to like him. This is especially troubling for Clinton since the schedule slows dramatically now and a full month will pass before the next big-state showdown. All of this allows candidates ample time to introduce themselves to voters in each state — which plays to Obama’s core strengths.
- She lost more states. Obama carried 14 states, six more than Clinton, and showed appeal in every geographical region. His win in bellwether Missouri was impressive by nearly every measure, marked by victories among men and women, secular and churchgoing voters, and urban and suburban voters. (My note: If Obama squeaks out a win today in NM--we may not know until tonight sometime--it will show he can win in a heavily Latino state--even more than CO--where the popular Latino Gov. "all but" endorsed Clinton.
- She lost the January cash war. Money chases momentum, so Obama crushing’s 2-to-1 fundraising victory last month is revealing. He raised more than $31 million; Clinton raised less than $14 million. The implication is hard to ignore: Democratic activists and donors are flocking to Obama at a pace that could have a profound effect on the race going forward.
- The calendar is her enemy. Now that more than half the states have weighed in, there is a fairly predictable formula for determining who is most likely to win the upcoming contests. In caucus states, Obama’s organizational strength shines: He has won seven of eight. Up next are three more caucus states, Washington, Nebraska and Maine. Obama also runs tremendously well in states with large African-American populations, another promising sign since next Tuesday’s three primaries are in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia — all of which have significant percentages of black voters. Then comes another caucus state, Hawaii, where Obama is viewed as a native son. The bottom line is that it figures to be another month before Clinton hits a stretch of states — places like Ohio and Pennsylvania — where she will be strongly favored to win. So it couldn’t be any clearer as to why the supposedly inevitable candidacy is anything but — even when she’s supposedly winning.
I would add that Obama has time to eat away at her Ohio and PA leads and to win big in TX in March. Also, even if the media keep spinning last night in Clinton's favor, it will count in the popular mind as one win. Obama has many chances to win during the rest of the month. The Clinton spin that they "stopped the Obama momentum" ain't true. They just slowed it down. Her desire for a series of new debates with him shows how desperate she is for free air time.
2 comments:
I hate to think of you shivering in the basement. Why can't you move your office upstairs? It's just astonishing to me that people can vote for Clinton against Obama.
I do think that the money issue is the biggest one here. If he continues to raise money like he has been, she'll have to borrow a lot more from herself to keep up. The other day, you mentioned his uptick in White Male Votes, and then I read that Obama's Super Bowl adds I'd seen were nationwide and not simply localized. That he, not any of the others, had the money to buy adds then, at a time when people were watching ads (especially males) may be key here. Money does play a role, though not always an essential one.
Post a Comment